Ara.so vs Healos.ai: True Ambient Scribe vs Workflow Plugin

Public gaps in compliance story

Healos' site highlights workflow automation but does not outline where audio or transcripts live, nor does it mention BAAs or self-hosting. That leaves security teams guessing how PHI is stored.

Ara ships with Azure-anchored deployments, full audit logs, and optional self-hosting so legal teams can greenlight the rollout immediately.

• Healos marketing focuses on 'assistant' features, not explicit HIPAA claims.
• Ara provides BAAs, DPAs, and customer-controlled retention on day one.
• Security teams reviewing Healos would still need to request architecture diagrams that Ara already publishes.

Ambient vs portal-first workflows

Healos showcases templates clinicians fill out manually to trigger summaries. That means the note only starts once someone types. If the visit deviates, the assistant has no audio context to reference.

Ara continuously listens, tags the conversation, and generates SOAP output without extra clicks. Providers simply open Ara alongside the EHR and keep talking.

• Ara removes portal uploads entirely.
• Dual-channel audio keeps every voice separated, which Healos never references.
• Structured exports push straight to the chart; no copy/paste.

Scalability

Because Healos is positioned as a workflow assistant, you still need staff to verify prompts. Ara runs unattended, and ops teams get adoption analytics per specialty so they can expand with confidence.